🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to pull out from an international accord created to protect females from violence, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in Riga this week to oppose the decision. The ultimate decision now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last year, mandating governments to establish laws and support services to end all types of violence.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to begin the process of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a move that human rights organizations described as a major regression for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its focus on equal rights undermines traditional families and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action sponsored by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the crowd.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the main parties advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent vote has sparked broad outcry both inside the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a national appeal calling for the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a demonstration for the coming week, accusing MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a rash decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty four years ago, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds support, the president could potentially send back the legislation for further consideration if he has concerns.

President Rinkevics stated on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional principles, "considering state and legal considerations, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but across the continent," commented a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse rates have been increasing in several European countries
• The European treaty mandates particular legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable discussions in additional member states